eMediNews - Medical Forum | Health Discussion

Ads by eMediNews
February 07, 2012, 04:52:31 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
eMediNews Health Directory
News: eMediNews is created and owned by Dr. Teoh Ken Ang, MBBS
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
Author Topic: Circumcision May Reduce Penile Sensitivity  (Read 2271 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Admin Topic starter
Administrator
Super Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 29
Posts: 612



View Profile
« on: May 23, 2007, 01:27:21 pm »

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Apr 13 - Findings from a new study suggest that circumcised penises are less sensitive than their uncircumcised counterparts.

The study, which is reported in the April issue of BJU International, was conducted by a research team headed by Dr. Morris Sorrells and Dr. Mark D. Reiss, both affiliates of Doctors Opposing Circumcision, a group opposed to non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.

As reported in BJU International for April, the study involved a comparison of penile sensitivity between 68 uncircumcised and 91 circumcised men. Semmes-Weinstein monofilament touch-test sensory evaluators were used to assess sensitivity.

The glans of circumcised penises was less sensitive to fine touch than that of uncircumcised penises, the report indicates.

Maximum sensitivity locations also differed by penis type. In circumcised penises, the ventral surface at the site of the circumcision scar was most sensitive, whereas the most sensitive in uncircumcised penises was the transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce. Five regions typically removed during circumcision were found to be more sensitive than the ventral surface at the site of the circumcision scar.

The authors call for additional studies using vibratory, hot, and cold stimuli to better understand how sensitivity changes with circumcision.

BJU Int 2007;99:864-869.

Source: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/555201?src=mp
Logged
eMediNews - Medical Forum | Health Discussion
   

 Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
An Article I Found Really Interesting!! (MUST READ!!) Seeking Knowledge 0 2356 Last post April 22, 2010, 07:28:13 pm
by Seeking Knowledge
Nanocontainers for wide medical application baltakay 0 683 Last post September 17, 2010, 02:42:10 pm
by baltakay
FDA Approvals: Tamiflu, Differin, Carnitor SF Admin 0 2269 Last post July 16, 2007, 08:44:40 pm
by Admin
AHA Updates NSAID Advice for Heart Disease Patients Admin 0 2833 Last post May 10, 2007, 07:57:16 pm
by Admin
Chronic Renal Failure Admin 0 3353 Last post March 30, 2007, 09:36:56 am
by Admin
Loading...

Powered by  MyPagerank.Net Page Strength SEO Tool - SEOmoz.org Yahoo bot last visit powered by MyPagerank.NetMsn bot last visit powered by MyPagerank.Net
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Bad Behavior has blocked 2142 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Page created in 0.141 seconds with 33 queries.