eMediNews - Medical Forum | Health Discussion

Ads by eMediNews
February 09, 2012, 06:59:28 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
eMediNews Health Directory
News: Inactive accounts (number of posts remains zero) 7 days after registration will be deleted without prior notice!
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
Author Topic: Contraceptive Patch More Likely Than Pill to Cause Venous Thromboembolism  (Read 2230 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Admin Topic starter
Administrator
Super Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 29
Posts: 612



View Profile
« on: April 07, 2007, 10:27:12 pm »

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Feb 19 - Women who use a transdermal contraceptive system are more than twice as likely to develop venous thromboembolism as those who use an oral contraceptive, new research shows.

Due to the rarity of events, the researchers were unable to determine if use of the contraceptive patch increases the risk of MI and stroke, according to the report in the February issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The study involved 49,048 women who used the norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol patch (Ortho Evra) and 202,344 who used norgestimate-containing oral contraceptives with ethinyl estradiol between April 2002 and December 2004.

Dr. Alexander M. Walker and colleagues, from i3 Drug Safety in Auburndale, Massachusetts, note that at the study's inception, it was not known if users of the transdermal system ran the same risk of stroke, MI and venous thromboembolism as users of oral contraceptives. They do point out that the FDA changed the labeling in 2005 to warn of a possible increased risk of thrombotic events because of a higher average circulating estrogen level with the transdermal contraceptive system.

The researchers found that the venous thromboembolism rate in patch users was 2.2-times higher than in pill users: 40.8 vs. 18.3 cases per 100,000 woman-years. In a nested case-control analysis, which excluded high-risk factors, the risk was elevated 2.4-fold.

Three patch users and seven pill users experienced a myocardial infarction, a difference that wasn't statistically significant. No patch users experienced a stroke, but 10 pill users did, the investigators report.

Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:339-346.
Logged
mdmjane
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 41


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2007, 08:15:59 pm »

How about hormone replacement therapy? Will it cause the same complication? How dangerous is Venous Thromboembolism?
Logged
eMediNews - Medical Forum | Health Discussion
   

 Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Books.ObGyn dewedark 4 554 Last post January 18, 2012, 03:53:00 pm
by lorraine02
looking for answers mleigh23 10 4158 Last post September 03, 2008, 08:20:42 pm
by drasgarhossain
Ultimate USMLE Collection: Steps 1, 2 & 3 Videos, Books & Audiobooks « 1 2 » safaribiker 21 3976 Last post July 01, 2011, 06:08:38 am
by safaribiker
Books.Cardio dewedark 3 550 Last post December 30, 2011, 01:00:31 pm
by bhollen76
Cialis Tadalafil Minor and Major Side Effects Katie448 0 932 Last post May 15, 2009, 03:38:22 pm
by Katie448
Loading...

Powered by  MyPagerank.Net Page Strength SEO Tool - SEOmoz.org Yahoo bot last visit powered by MyPagerank.NetMsn bot last visit powered by MyPagerank.Net
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Bad Behavior has blocked 1912 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Page created in 0.092 seconds with 34 queries.