eMediNews - Medical Forum | Health Discussion

Ads by eMediNews
May 22, 2012, 02:32:30 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
eMediNews Health Directory
News: eMediNews is created and owned by Dr. Teoh Ken Ang, MBBS
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  



Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
Author Topic: No sedation for mechanical ventilation  (Read 959 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kkmalaysia Topic starter
Super Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 259



View Profile
« on: July 09, 2010, 11:05:26 am »

The standard practice for mechanical ventilation on an intensive care unit (ICU) is to sedate the patient. Studies of daily interruption of sedation have shown that it reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation, possibly reduces the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder, and reduces the risks of ventilator-associated pneumonia, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, bacteraemia, barotraumas, venous thromboembolism, cholestasis, and severe sinusitis.

In Odense, Denmark, the practice since 1999 has been to give intravenous morphine but no sedatives or analgesics. Now, researchers there have compared no sedation (NS) with daily interrupted sedation (DIS).

A total of 140 patients on mechanical ventilation were randomized to NS or DIS with propofol for 48 hours and then midazolam. Bolus doses of morphine were given in both groups. The analysis included 113 patients. In the first 28 days the mean number of days without ventilation was 13.8 days (NS) vs 9.6 days (DIS), a significant difference. NS was also significantly associated with a shorter stay in ICU and in hospital. Agitated delirium was more frequent in the NS group (20% vs 7%). The groups did not differ significantly in the frequency of accidental extubation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, or requests for CT o MRI brain scans.

The NS policy appeared to be advantageous. A multicentre study is called for.

Strøm T et al. A protocol of no sedation for critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomized trial. Lancet 2010; 375:475–480; Brochard L. Less sedation in intensive care: the pendulum swings back. Ibid: 436–438 (comment).
Logged
mypulseox
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Age: 25
Location: USA
Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2011, 10:56:03 pm »

I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on this topic.
Logged
eMediNews - Medical Forum | Health Discussion
   

 Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Add bookmark  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
Books.Dentistry dewedark 0 389 Last post September 28, 2011, 09:28:48 am
by dewedark
Books.Cardio dewedark 3 1025 Last post December 30, 2011, 01:00:31 pm
by bhollen76
FDA Safety Changes: Actiq, Lotensin HCT, Lotrel, Prinivil Admin 0 3002 Last post May 23, 2007, 01:08:59 pm
by Admin
New Strategies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Evaluation and Management Admin 0 1809 Last post June 23, 2007, 01:26:41 pm
by Admin
Acute Renal Failure Admin 0 5497 Last post March 30, 2007, 09:01:31 am
by Admin
Loading...

Powered by  MyPagerank.Net Page Strength SEO Tool - SEOmoz.org Yahoo bot last visit powered by MyPagerank.NetMsn bot last visit powered by MyPagerank.Net
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

Bad Behavior has blocked 744 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Page created in 0.098 seconds with 33 queries.